Over the past couple of days, a working paper from Jan Fredrick Cruz from the Ateneo center for Economic Research and Development has been getting much media attention for estimating that the Philippines may have had close to 3 million undetected COVID-19 cases in the 2nd quarter alone. The paper, titled An Empirical Argument for Mass Testing: Crude Estimates of Unreported COVID19 Cases in the Philippines vis-Ã -vis Others in the ASEAN-5 can be downloaded here.
Essentially, the paper uses Singapore’s case fatality rate (CFR) to re-compute the fatality rate of other ASEAN countries. The main issue here is that Singapore’s CFR is really low and is obviously an outlier in comparison to CFRs of other countries. Based on the latest mortality data compiled by John Hopkins University, Singapore currently has the lowest CFR. JHU lists it at 0.0% since they only go up to the first decimal place, but Singapore’s current CFR is about 0.05%. This is now slightly lower than its CFR in Q2. The median CFR among around 160 countries is currently about 2.2%, while the global CFR is around 3.5%. The Philippines’ CFR is currently 1.6%.
So what the Ateneo paper did is assume that Singapore’s best-in-the-world CFR is also applicable to other ASEAN countries, to come up with an estimate of undetected cases.
The first problem with this is that Singapore’s CFR is really absurdly low. If you apply Singapore’s CFR to a country like Germany (4% CFR) which currently has about 230,000 cases, you’ll come up with a total of about 18.4 million cases. Note that Germany is one of the countries considered to have performed well in addressing the pandemic.
The second problem is that the CFR is subject to change as testing capacity improves and more asymptomatic/mild cases are detected. The Philippines’ current CFR is half of its CFR in Q2. If we now use the paper’s method of applying Singapore’s CFR to the Philippines’ current CFR, the total estimated cases would then be about 2.4 million cases, compared to 178,000 cases as of August 20, 2020. So the paper estimated 2.8 million cases in Q2 alone, but applying the same method now would yield a lower estimate. That doesn’t make sense at all and shows the crude methodology’s lack of self-consistency. It’s such a simple sanity check that the author should have done before pushing out this paper.
The author uses the paper’s findings to conclude that the Philippines should improve its testing and tracing strategy. I have no objections there, but at least try to make arguments that make sense. Insisting that we should expect Singapore’s CFR to be applicable to the Philippines may lull us into thinking that COVID-19 is not that dangerous, if, after all, we did indeed “miss” 3 million cases and only have fewer than 3,000 deaths.
(Note: This is not a personal finance-related post. I’ll be back to regular programming shortly.)
It’s been quite a while since my last post on March 1, 2020. At that time, there were only 91,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases worldwide and only 3 in the Philippines. Only China and certain parts of Italy had imposed lockdowns. Since then, the pandemic has exploded worldwide with millions of cases, several hundreds of thousands dead, and quite a few economies in recession.
The Philippines has been in various levels of lockdown since the middle of March. During this time, the Filipino penchant for coming up with an alphabet soup of initialisms is in full display: ECQ, GCQ, MGCQ, MCQ, LSI, APOR. Compared to some of its Asian neighbors, the Philippines has not fared well in terms of the number of cases and fatalities.
Each day, typically around 4 p.m., the Philippine Department of Health (DOH) releases new confirmed numbers for the day. The DOH later releases what they call a data drop consisting of data files containing case, testing, and medical facility capacity information for the day. I’ve decided to see for myself what the DOH discloses in these data files.
The numbers so far as of August 18, 2020.
DOH Confirmed COVID-19 Figures as of 08/18/2020
Daily announced numbers are just the cases the DOH has confirmed.
I think this has been made clear several weeks ago when the DOH started to distinguish between “fresh” and “late” cases. They have since stopped making this distinction in more recent announcements, but it is still the case that for each new batch of numbers announced everyday, some cases date back to several days or weeks ago. For the 4,836 new cases confirmed on August 18, the chart below shows the distribution of onset dates. Most cases were from the first half of August, and some from July. (Note that in the DOH data files, not all cases have recorded onset dates. In these cases, the date of specimen collection is used as proxy).
Obviously, the number of new cases announced each day is a function of how efficient the DOH is able to confirm new cases. There is still a significant backlog of cases that are pending validation as I’ll show below. So, if one day, the DOH announces 10,000 new cases — which would be a new record — it’s not necessarily time to panic even though media outlets will find it hard to resist to sensationalize this number. It’s also not necessarily time to declare victory if, one day, the DOH suddenly announces only 500 new cases after several days of >3000 daily cases. To repeat, the new daily confirmed case numbers do not necessarily reflect the growth or decline of the pandemic.
A better, but still incomplete, way of looking at the epidemic curve is by plotting the cases by date of onset as shown below. While the plot based on confirmation date shows a couple of days with 6000+ new cases, we can see from the plot below that, based on the date of onset, we haven’t seen a 5000+ day. That might change later on as pending cases are validated.
The same is true with the the number of deaths. On July 12, 2020 the DOH announced 162 confirmed deaths. If we look at the plot of deaths by date shown below, we haven’t had a day with 50+ deaths. This does not necessarily mean that we’re doing well. I think it’s just important to put the numbers in context.
While testing capacity has increased, positivity rate is still above 10%.
The DOH daily data files include the number of tests performed and number of positive test results each day from the different accredited testing centers around the country. While the testing capacity has definitely improved, the positivity rate has remained above 10% for the past month or so.
There is still a significant number of positive test results that are pending validation.
The plot above shows that there are still around 40,000 positive tests pending validation. The good news is that the backlog has stopped increasing around late July. This could mean that the DOH has ramped up its validation rate or the rate of new positive test results have plateaued or slowed down.
If we look closer at the plot of daily positive test results below, we can see that the number of new positive results have indeed somewhat plateaued around late July. I’m hoping that this could be a sign that the spread is slowing down, but I still would like to see the positivity rate go down.
Age Distribution of Cases and Deaths
The distribution of confirmed cases over the past months have stayed almost the same, with the bulk of cases in the 25 to 34 age bracket.
As for deaths, the distribution definitely skews towards older age brackets. Without the proper context (e.g. comorbidity), it is concerning though that we have at least 30 confirmed deaths in the 0-4 range. The US with more than 5 million cases has recorded only 26 deaths in the 0-4 range as of August 8, 2020.
What about excess mortality?
The DOH has so far confirmed a total of 2,687 COVID-19 deaths since the pandemic began. While every death is of course unfortunate, how does this number compare to the typical all-cause death rates in the Philippines. Tracking all-cause deaths may give us an idea on whether the total number of COVID-19 deaths so far makes sense against the overall death statistics in the country. (See this Financial Times link for how they track this statistic for other countries.) The Philippine Statistics Agency recently published preliminary death statistics for the first half of 2020. So far, recorded deaths in the months of March to May are tracking below the average deaths per month from previous years. The June figure is still well below the average and this may be due to delayed reporting. If the trend holds, it would appear that deaths from COVID-19 have not yet made a significant impact on overall mortality for 2020. Obviously, it is still too early to make any conclusion based on these preliminary numbers.
We’re still probably not yet at the appropriate testing levels to be able to find cases quickly enough and to be able to lower the positivity rate.
The DOH has to improve their validation/confirmation rate to quickly reduce the cases that are pending validation.
Recent trends in daily new positive test numbers are encouraging but do not yet show a clear downtrend.
The total deaths from COVID-19 has not yet caused a spike above the average death rates based on preliminary 2020 numbers.
An easier option is to invest in a unit investment trust fund (UITF) that acts as a feeder for a U.S. index fund. One such feeder fund is the BPI Invest U.S. Equity Index Feeder Fund (BPIUSFF). This fund invests directly in the largest ETF in the world, the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (SPY). This ETF has total assets of almost $280 billion as of November 2019. It simply aims to track S&5 500 index of U.S. large cap companies. One reason why people like to invest in index funds is the low expense ratio. SPY’s gross expense ratio is only .0945%.
FMETF is currently the only exchange-traded fund (ETF) available in the Philippine Stock Exchange. FMETF was launched in 2013 and aims to track the performance of the PSE Composite Index (PSEI), which tracks 30 companies in the Philippine Stock Exchange.
As of November 4, 2019, FMETF’s total assets is PHP 1,680,365,665.87 or about $33.3 million. In comparison, the total PSEi market capitalization is PHP 10,073,517,502,927.30 or about $199.4 billion. So, FMETF’s market cap is 0.0167% of that of the PSEi, six years after it was first introduced. And again in that span of time, no other ETF was introduced in the market.
I was curious how ETFs in a neighboring countries fare. The Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) has a quite a few ETFs available. The TDEX ETF introduced in 2007 tracks the SET50 index, and the ETF has total assets of $3.1 billion compared to SET50 capitalization of $388 billion. TDEX’s market cap is about 0.8% of that of the SET50 index. Keep in mind that there several ETFs in the Thailand market, some covering the larger SET100 and quite a few covering specific sectors. Needless to say, the Thai stock market is larger than the Philippine market.
In the US, losses incurred from selling stocks from losing investments can be used to lower capital gains from winning trades.Short-term capital gains are taxed as though they are ordinary income which is taxed based on a progressive tax table. Near the end of the year, if you already have realized some gains (that you’ll have to pay taxes on) and are still holding on to some losing positions, you may decide to cut your losses and sell your losing stock positions. This will allow you to harvest losses to offset some of your gains, thereby reducing taxes that you’ll have to pay. If you don’t have any gains to offset, you can also reduce your ordinary income (wages, etc.) by up to $3,000 of your losses. In a way, this may encourage you to stop holding to that losing stock and cut your losses, and also reduce your tax bill. On the other hand, the stock might recover and you’ll miss out on it. You’re not allowed to buy the stock again within 30 days of selling it, and still be able to harvest the loss, because of wash sale rules.
I decided to purchase a monitor — the LG 27UD58P-B 27″ IPS 4K UHD monitor — from Newegg.com. It’s US list price at the time of purchase was $279.99. The PH price was PHP 15,053.99 for an effective 53.76:1 exchange rate. This exchange rate isn’t too bad and it appears that Newegg still forces the converted price to end with .99, at least for items they sell directly (non-Marketplace items).